Quotes proving that Stephen Harper is not a Canadian Conservative:
(thus providing me with further reasons to not vote for his Party ...)
"Toryism has the historical context of hierarchy and elitism and is a different kind of political philosophy. It's not my favourite term, but we're probably stuck with it."
* I told you he wasn't a Tory;
"I think in Atlantic Canada, because of what happened in the decades following Confederation, there is a culture of defeat that we have to overcome."
* Where is his proof for this statement?
"Atlantic Canada's culture of defeat will be hard to overcome as long as Atlantic Canada is actually physically trailing the rest of the country."
* It trails the Country simply because it is sparsely populated and has not won the Carbon-Lottery, in widespread fashion. I guess we should just abandon the unlucky blighters eh ?
"But I'm very libertarian in the sense that I believe in small government and, as a general rule, I don't believe in imposing values upon people."
* Liberatarian ideology is an amalgam of French and American anarchist theory - it is foreign to Canada, and is dangerous to the Common Good;
"Canada appears content to become a second-tier socialistic country, boasting ever more loudly about its economy and social services to mask its second-rate status."
* I contend that we are a Nation of the First-Rank. In 2005, the UN and OECD agreed. Stephen doesn't like facts that get in the way of making us the 51st State;
"In my judgment Canada will eventually join with the allied coalition if war on Iraq comes to pass."
* He shows good instincts for the National Mood - again;
"I don't know all the facts on Iraq, but I think we should work closely with the Americans."
* Where would he have stood in 1911?
"I think there is a dangerous rise in defeatist sentiment in this country. I have said that repeatedly, and I mean it and I believe it."
* He is proud of his Country, ain't he?
"It was the removing of a regime that was hostile, that clearly had the intention of constructing weapons systems. "
* He believes US propaganda and seemingly, would send Canadian Soldiers to die for it;
"On the justification for the war, it wasn't related to finding any particular weapon of mass destruction."
* He reads from the same Prayer-Book as "Dubya";
"We should have been there shoulder to shoulder with our allies. Our concern is the instability of our government as an ally. We are playing again with national and global security matters."
* I detested Jean Chretien more than most, but he was right about Iraq;
"I will strive to make this not the highest-spending country in the world, but instead the lowest taxing one."
* What about our obligations to our fellow Countrymen? Isn't that more important than reducing our quality of life to below that of the United States ? And one more thing Stephen: Equalisation is enshrined in the Constitution Act, 1982;
"It is imperative to take the initiative, to build firewalls around Alberta, to limit the extent to which an aggressive and hostile federal government can encroach upon legitimate provincial jurisdiction."
* Tories were the creators of a centralised Federal System. I guess Harper is an "Oliver Mowat Conservative" which is a non sequitur, as Mowat was a Liberal;
"The nature of our constitution is that everyone is supposed to be able to do their own thing in their own area of jurisdiction."
* No - the nature of the Canadian Consitution is that the Dominion has a "Constitution similar in Principle to that of the United Kingdom" and that it is "... lawful for the Queen, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate and House of Commons, to make laws for the Peace, Order and good Government of Canada";
"There is a Canadian culture that is in some ways unique to Canada, but I don't think Canadian culture coincides neatly with borders. "
* What does this mean? I would guess that he would not defend Canadian culture in a trade-dispute with the United States? What about water that courses its way outside of our Borders? hmmmmmmmm?
"Whether Canada ends up as one national government or two national governments or several national governments, or some other kind of arrangement is, quite frankly, secondary in my opinion."
* This would appear to be anathema to traditional Conservative thought on the Constitution and Canadian Federalism;
"You've got to remember that west of Winnipeg the ridings the Liberals hold are dominated by people who are either recent Asian immigrants or recent migrants from eastern Canada: people who live in ghettoes and who are not integrated into western Canadian society."
* I was born, raised and lived in Ontario until 1995. I now live in the West. I don't live in a ghetto. And what exactly is western Canadian society? I live in Canada - purely and simply. When I travel this land, I am constantly amazed by the similarity in values from East to West (with the exception of Quebecois' language policy ...) - with the lone exception of those who want us to become Americans !
6 Comments:
Love your blog and the loyal sentiments attached therein, Aeneas. As a Tory, I would have to agree with Harper on his rather selective reading of traditional Toryism. But it's also about reverence for our history, our traditions and institutions. I like to think those things are still relevant. Harper's "God Bless Canada" annunciations reflect that he's more in league with American sentiment than British, but when it comes right down to it, I trust Harper over Martin to preserve our national institutions. The Liberals are apostate on the question of culture and tradition. Unless the Liberals get turfed, the monarchy will be next. MARK MY WORDS.
beaverbrook:
While I believe in equality before the law, I do not accept that we have - or should seek - equality across the board in society, and question whether the American system of economic elitism (which we seem to have embraced) is superior to the traditional British & Canadian hiearchies of Land Holding, Public Service, & Occupational Achievement and Position (UEL, clergy, military rank, educational status etc ...). However, I digress.
I am not so sure that I agree with you on Harper and trust him to defend our National Institutions.
Please see http://www.monarchist.ca/cmnews/CMN_summer_2003_Update-8.pdf
for more on this.
I do believe that the Forces retain some of the best and brightest exemplars of loyalty in the Dominion. I honour your service and respect your commitment to Queen and Country. (FYI, I spent 15 years as an active, and at times ranking, member of the PC Party and I can tell you that the faction that split to form the Reform and Alliance Party were not really Monrachists in any way, shape, or form. Most of them are either uneducated about Canada and her Traditions, or blatantly reject them in favour of the American model. Most of my loyal colleagues in the Party were from the Atlantic Provinces, Ontario, and Manitoba. West of that, they were all republicans.)
As a loyal Soldier, I can understand your ambivalence in all of this - I mean, you have to vote for somebody! The Forces badly need investment. The Conservatives claim they will do this. There are SOME loyal people in the CPC to be sure, and at least that is a comfort.
As for me and my House, I know too many of them to trust them.
As an aside, do you realise that the "Blogging Tories" refused to have me on their Blogroll ? I find this strange as my views are traditionally Canadian and certainly tory.
Why do you think this is? I think I know why ...
I lve your site, which is why it is in the top three links on my site. God Save the Queen !
The Blogging Tories denied Red Tory Glory membership on their blogroll? Well, I suppose you don't have to be a Harper cheerleader, but you can't be excessively negative about the guy either. My guess is that you were critical without being supportive, and too critical without being supportive of the new Conservatives generally.
I defintely agree with you on the Forces. I'm a former officer in Her Majesty's Canadian Navy myself, which is proof again that service instills loyalty. To this day, I resent the Liberal nationalists needlessly taking away the RCN and RCAF in the name of integration. There is no irony in the fact that the Americanization of Canada has taken place more under the Liberals than the Tories.
The Prairies have always been different from Upper Canadian traditions. Not all traditions in this country are shared equally across the regions...they tend to be more populist than wedded to central canada's Tory heritage. I'm from British Columbia, another loyalist subset altogether. We are not UELs in the Upper Canadian mold, but a once proud isolated colony with its own uniquely strange quirks that rose from its settlement. In Victoria and other places, we are probably the most outwardly proud and confident of our British heritage than anywhere else in the country. So you are where you come from meaning that our regional diversity requires that we form national coalitions in order to gain access to power.
Thanks, Aeneas. I plan on visiting often and have added you under the "Tory Manifesto" right sidebar button at my work in progress.
bb:
I can't disagree with much of what you wrote. Integration of the Forces was a blunder. I wonder what Paul Hellyer has to say about it these says ?
My toryism is so ingranined that I now reject the term "conservative" as I think that its real meaning has been confused and lost across North America.
I accept that we need to build coalitions, but I cannot accept a coalition with republicans.
I find it quite revealing that that my CPC MP has sent all of his Children to higher education in the USA. I found this out in talking with him at our local Car Wash last Winter. He kept praising the "American way of life." I played along with him until he made this statement, and then countered with the fact that this Dominion was founded upon principles in direct opposition to the American way of life. He was quick to move on after this.
Beware ! I do applaud your idealism about practical politics however; mine was displaced to a great degree after Mulroney failed to increase defence spending in the '80's, and then during the NAFTA election in 1988. I was also disappointed that he never had HM The Queen open Parliament as Diefenbaker did in 1957.
I may write in "George Grant" or "Sir John A. Macdonald" on my ballot. I feel that way now. Who knows ?
Loyally Yours ...
Hate to break it to you, but I feel loyalty to my country. HM the Queen may be a nice lady, but I don't feel loyalty to her, and I assure you I speak for the majority of Canadians in saying so. This is a nation of immigrants, not of Englishmen.
Which, incidentally, makes us rather similar to the Americans.
cheers
-lecentre, of www.centrerion.blogspot.com
lecentre:
I find it interesting and intriguing - nevertheless, to find that you are the true representative of the national & general will. Who knew?
I guess we should pledge our allegiance to You, now that we know! Thanks for sharing.
Have your read the Canadian Constitution? Thought not ...
Have you read the Canadian Citizenship Oath? Thought not ...
Have you considered that the Queen's ethnicity is multi-varied? Thought not ...
Have you considered that the Commonwealth is multi-racial and diverse? Thought not ...
Your view is annexationist tripe, and you are no better than Stephen Harper and the CPC when it comes to maintaining an independant and diverse Canada. It is because of people like YOU that we have become annexed in all but name and form, to the American Empire.
Loyalty has nothing to do with being English - it is a freely and consciously arrived-at choice. I choose to be Loyal, because I choose to be Canadian. Because I am Canadian, I remain Loyal.
If you choose to be American, then that is sad for you. But it is people like you who have sold-out Canada. When I visited Vimy Ridge & Juno Beach in 1998, I was able to hold my head high in the knowledge that I "had not broken faith with those who died" for King & Country.
Can you say the same?
Thought not ...
As you sow, so shall Ye reap ...
(Feel free to come back - after you become a little more educated)
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home